↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty in Georeferencing Current and Historic Plant Locations

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Restoration, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertainty in Georeferencing Current and Historic Plant Locations
Published in
Ecological Restoration, May 2009
DOI 10.3368/er.27.2.152
Authors

K. McEachern, K. Niessen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Student > Master 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Computer Science 1 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,768,687
of 16,076,911 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Restoration
#93
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,374
of 308,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Restoration
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,076,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.