You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adaptive genomic structural variation in the grape powdery mildew pathogen, Erysiphe necator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Jones, Summaira Riaz, Abraham Morales-Cruz, Katherine CH Amrine, Brianna McGuire, W Douglas Gubler, M Andrew Walker, Dario Cantu |
| Abstract |
Powdery mildew, caused by the obligate biotrophic fungus Erysiphe necator, is an economically important disease of grapevines worldwide. Large quantities of fungicides are used for its control, accelerating the incidence of fungicide-resistance. Copy number variations (CNVs) are unbalanced changes in the structure of the genome that have been associated with complex traits. In addition to providing the first description of the large and highly repetitive genome of E. necator, this study describes the impact of genomic structural variation on fungicide resistance in Erysiphe necator. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Argentina | 2 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 23% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,758,035
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#418
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,425
of 364,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#12
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.