↓ Skip to main content

Plasma glutamine concentration after intensive care unit discharge: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma glutamine concentration after intensive care unit discharge: an observational study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0677-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Smedberg, Johanna Nordmark Grass, Linn Pettersson, Åke Norberg, Olav Rooyackers, Jan Wernerman

Abstract

IntroductionLow plasma glutamine concentration at ICU admission is associated with unfavorable outcomes. The prediction of plasma glutamine concentration after ICU discharge on outcomes has not been characterized. In the recent Scandinavian Glutamine Trial a survival advantage was seen with glutamine supplementation as long as patients stayed in the ICU. It was therefore hypothesized that glutamine level may drop at ICU discharge, indicative of a sustained glutamine deficiency which may be related to outcome.MethodsFully fed ICU patients intravenously supplemented with glutamine for >3 days were studied at ICU discharge and post-ICU. In study A, plasma glutamine level was followed every 5 to 7 days post ICU of remaining hospital stay and compared to the level on the day of ICU discharge (n =63). In study B, plasma glutamine level 24 to 72 hours after ICU discharge was related to 12 months all cause mortality (n =100).ResultsPost-ICU plasma glutamine levels were within normal range and were not found to be predictive for mortality outcome. Plasma glutamine level at discharge, on the other hand, was within normal limits but higher in non-survivors. In addition, it was adding prediction value to discharge SOFA scores for post ICU mortality.ConclusionPost-ICU glutamine levels are not indicative of glutamine depletion. The relation between plasma glutamine concentration and glutamine availability during critical illness is not well understood, and needs to be studied further to define the possible role for glutamine supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,913
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,132
of 368,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#97
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.