↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Recent advances in the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Postgraduate Medical Journal, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent advances in the treatment of erectile dysfunction
Published in
Postgraduate Medical Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134073
Pubmed ID
28751439
Authors

David F Mobley, Mohit Khera, Neil Baum

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common conditions affecting middle-aged and older men. Nearly every primary care physician, internist and geriatrician will be called upon to manage this condition or to make referrals to urologists, endocrinologists and cardiologists who will assist in the treatment of ED. This article will briefly discuss the diagnosis and management of ED. In addition, emerging concepts in ED management will be discussed, such as the use of testosterone to treat ED, the role of the endothelium in men with ED and treating the partner of the man with ED. Finally, future potential therapies for ED will be discussed.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Postgraduate 26 13%
Student > Master 23 11%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 63 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 72 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,179,538
of 21,201,553 outputs
Outputs from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#231
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,265
of 443,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,201,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.