↓ Skip to main content

The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
91 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003162.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malcolm P Hilton, Darren K Pinder

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2002 and previously updated in 2004 and 2007.Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a syndrome characterised by short-lived episodes of vertigo in association with rapid changes in head position. It is a common cause of vertigo presenting to primary care and specialist otolaryngology clinics. Current treatment approaches include rehabilitative exercises and physical manoeuvres, including the Epley manoeuvre.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 303 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 12%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Other 70 23%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 15%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 56 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#224,689
of 17,391,055 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#462
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,726
of 313,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,391,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.