You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003162.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malcolm P Hilton, Darren K Pinder |
| Abstract |
This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2002 and previously updated in 2004 and 2007.Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a syndrome characterised by short-lived episodes of vertigo in association with rapid changes in head position. It is a common cause of vertigo presenting to primary care and specialist otolaryngology clinics. Current treatment approaches include rehabilitative exercises and physical manoeuvres, including the Epley manoeuvre. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 89% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 487 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 9% |
| Researcher | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 98 | 20% |
| Unknown | 130 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 10% |
| Unknown | 143 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#395,082
of 24,901,761 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#692
of 13,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,689
of 372,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,901,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.