↓ Skip to main content

Major sources of critical incidents in intensive care

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Major sources of critical incidents in intensive care
Published in
Critical Care, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingeborg D Welters, James Gibson, Martin Mogk, Richard Wenstone

Abstract

In recent years, critical incident (CI) reporting has increasingly been regarded as part of ongoing quality management. CI databanks also aim to improve health and safety issues for patients as well as staff. The aim of this study was to identify frequent causes of adverse events in critical care with the potential to harm patients, staff or visitors by analysing data from a voluntary and optionally anonymous critical incident reporting system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 23 28%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,089
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,701
of 143,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#33
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.