↓ Skip to main content

The effect of neural mobilisation on cervico-brachial pain: design of a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of neural mobilisation on cervico-brachial pain: design of a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cato A Basson, Aimee Stewart, Witness Mudzi

Abstract

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is often associated with shoulder or arm pain. There is a paucity of information on effective treatment for neck and arm pain, such as radiculopathy or cervico-brachial pain. Guidelines recommend neck mobilisation/ manipulation, exercises and advice as the treatment for neck pain, and neck and arm pain. There are a few studies that have used neural mobilisation as the treatment for cervico-brachial pain. Although results seem promising the studies have small sample sizes that make it difficult to draw definite conclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 4%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 80 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 25%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Unspecified 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 91 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,335,579
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#473
of 4,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,952
of 365,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#9
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.