RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
What a surprise.
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
!!!
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universi…
People often blame journalists for distorting/exaggerating scientific findings to the public. But it's mostly universities' own *press releases* doing much of the damage https://t.co/UVUfwGeZX4 https://t.co/Y1zTj1pxGD
A study published in @bmj_latest found that 40% of press releases contained exaggerated health advice, 33% contained exaggerated causal claims, and 36% contained exaggerated inference to humans from animal research. https://t.co/o41H2GsuuU
@PeopleCallMeLui We were looking at a couple of different papers here. However, one in particular sampled press releases on biomedical and health related science, alongside their associated peer reviewed research papers and news stories. Check it out here
@LordAmponsah_ We've got you! A study found that 40% of press releases contained exaggerated advice, 33% contained exaggerated causal claims, and 36% contained exaggerated inference to humans from animal research. https://t.co/rC8qxyAFzv
@RetoGysi @blick @swissinfo_en Vielen Dank! Ich kann mir gut vorstellen, dass sich die Übertreibungen/Verzerrungen bereits in der Komm-Abteilung einer Uni eingeschlichen haben. Eine Untersuchung aus Grossbritannien hat das vor einigen Jahren mal gut aufzei
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study "Most of the inflation... did not occur de novo in the media but was already present in the text of the press releases..."
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
RT @jkelovuori: Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.…
Stuart Ritchie's (i news) critique of a study on vaping & mouse pregnancy by Ozekin et al. Text hyperlinks: 1) https://t.co/HfLgqmaIYZ 2) https://t.co/OW8dIcLCpL 3) https://t.co/inU89aRhmp 4) https://t.co/6cx0sorHN2 5) https://t.co/G8FLJZcI44 6)
『ある論文の著者が論文では堅実な文章を書いているのに、本人のTwitterではひどく内容を誇張して宣伝している』 という事態(⬇️関連する論文)を事例として発表する報告など、Tweet内容を引用する必要がある・・などアリな気がします(匿名が無難で許容されそうだが)💬 https://t.co/7Ga2Ve8Rn0
@donniejsackey @DetroittoAccra The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://t.co/riC6cZLf6u (Published 10 December 2014)
@jlphistory There used to be a brilliant NHS site that critiqued medical research in the news. It’s gone sadly. This @bmj_latest article on research results exaggeration is quite interesting on the role of the press and the university press office…. https:
@zeynep And these two studies highlight the impact of press releases on downstream media exaggeration (at least in health science): https://t.co/Uv5eEXm31K https://t.co/0G8vbtFuWY
@skdh Maybe you're already familiar with them, but this is a great set of papers looking into this problem: First observational evidence https://t.co/ATrhp02blB, then a randomised trial (!) to establish the causal effect of press releases on news coverage
"if the majority of exaggeration occurs within academic establishments, then the academic community has the opportunity to make an important difference to the quality of biomedical and health related news" Sumner & coll. 2014 > https://t.co/BeYiIxw
ah, la inocente juventud, divino tesoro, en la que creía que todo era culpa de los periodistas
RT @SergioEfe: El peligro de las notas de prensa y la cobertura de temas de salud (probablemente extrapolable a otros campos en los que las…
El peligro de las notas de prensa y la cobertura de temas de salud (probablemente extrapolable a otros campos en los que las exageraciones dan más igual): "Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases". https://t.co/Tu
@chrislintott I 100% agree!! Everyone has responsibility along the line - cf that Cardiff U study. https://t.co/jkhxKRTGeo
@TheHenleyShift @Forbes As you can see by my feed, I like to mix it up (links to peer-reviewed studies, commentaries, pop press analysis, RTs from trusted sources, etc). Ditto our social media project, #ScienceUpFirst. Press releases often source hype: h
Source (2014) : https://t.co/9hexFSYdM5
RT @markdhumphries: Another example that media hype often comes from the scientists, not the media E.g. @chrisdc77 work on hype in press r…
Another example that media hype often comes from the scientists, not the media E.g. @chrisdc77 work on hype in press releases https://t.co/6C9Ib5nyeC
@1st_sealord Tuleeko tekeleen perusteella siis välittömästi lopettaa maskitus muualla kuin väestössä?Näin se varmaan pitäisi tulkita jos tulkitaan toiseen suuntaan yhtä varmasti;) @hsfi voisi myös uutisoinnissa kaivaa hieman syvemmälle,tiedotteet kun tutki
@sophtalkssci Absolutely! This work suggests that the responsibility largely lies with the researchers and the press releases that they produce. https://t.co/VI8h913YZh
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Erittäin tuttu ilmiö. Ei ole siis niin, että erityisesti toimittajat liioittelisivat vaan tutkijat aloittavat sen jo lehd…
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Erittäin tuttu ilmiö. Ei ole siis niin, että erityisesti toimittajat liioittelisivat vaan tutkijat aloittavat sen jo lehd…
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Erittäin tuttu ilmiö. Ei ole siis niin, että erityisesti toimittajat liioittelisivat vaan tutkijat aloittavat sen jo lehd…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Erittäin tuttu ilmiö. Ei ole siis niin, että erityisesti toimittajat liioittelisivat vaan tutkijat aloittavat sen jo lehd…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
Erittäin tuttu ilmiö. Ei ole siis niin, että erityisesti toimittajat liioittelisivat vaan tutkijat aloittavat sen jo lehdistötiedotteissa korostaakseen tutkimuksensa merkitystä.
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…
RT @JesperKivela: BMJ:ssä julkaistun artikkelin mukaan 33 %:ssa (60/182) tutkimusten lehdistötiedotteita oli liioittelua koskien syy-seurau…