RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
Most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the press releases issued by universities. https://t.co/UX7xYyi11O
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @tasteofthemed: https://t.co/TzExKa0moc interesting lessons here for university press releases. Application of @TrueHealthINIT @DrDavidK…
This seems an interesting lesson for Comms students as well as academics @melanie_james @paul_scott_ https://t.co/ptuf02JYWD
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Thread on research writeups in 'the meeja'. https://t.co/SdmCUMnpxi
RT @tasteofthemed: https://t.co/TzExKa0moc interesting lessons here for university press releases. Application of @TrueHealthINIT @DrDavidK…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
After reading this thread, I changed my mind about the poll (I did think scientists should be able to read the article in advance), and this was the tweet that did it. https://t.co/rXRu4Ld7l1
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
https://t.co/TzExKa0moc interesting lessons here for university press releases. Application of @TrueHealthINIT @DrDavidKatz principles would be a good start
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Ha - yes! I've noticed this on several occasions and it's *really* unhelpful. Stuff sexed up and potentially distorted twice can eventually totally misrepresent the findings. https://t.co/POHcF1Ro5H
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @ben_a_goldfarb: Indispensable thread in the “should scientists be allowed to check quotes” debate. Also a good reminder to regard pre…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @CTennie: Make sure you can live with what your press releases say. https://t.co/NEeO08EL0i
Extremely valuable thread for anyone doing science. https://t.co/IrUiKVNGGt
Great thread that all research scientists and science reporters and writers on science should read and contemplate h/t @Clive_Bates https://t.co/EFkthc5rD1
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
@GallioLab @kylejasmin Two responses: 1) Fact-checking, done right, will prevent exactly that. 2) Press releases from universities & major journals are rife with "less-than-restrained extrapolations.” https://t.co/siJVZ7b0ZH& https://t.co/Rg4kR5wa
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @ben_a_goldfarb: Indispensable thread in the “should scientists be allowed to check quotes” debate. Also a good reminder to regard pre…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
This is one reason why I prefer to find new studies on my own, rather than rely on press releases to tell me what's new. https://t.co/P4GXdvPTe8
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
One origin of fake news https://t.co/NvnQJpKdfr
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @mikamckinnon: Q: Have you seen the study that most inaccuracies originate from the press releases, content scientists already get to re…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @mikamckinnon: Q: Have you seen the study that most inaccuracies originate from the press releases, content scientists already get to re…
RT @mikamckinnon: Q: Have you seen the study that most inaccuracies originate from the press releases, content scientists already get to re…
Q: Have you seen the study that most inaccuracies originate from the press releases, content scientists already get to review? A: Yup. Here's a thread by one of the authors: https://t.co/xbNcWxzuHy
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…