↓ Skip to main content

Dificuldade de acesso a serviços de média complexidade em municípios de pequeno porte: um estudo de caso

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dificuldade de acesso a serviços de média complexidade em municípios de pequeno porte: um estudo de caso
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017224.27002016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camila Ribeiro Silva, Brigida Gimenez Carvalho, Luiz Cordoni Júnior, Elisabete de Fátima Pólo de Almeida Nunes

Abstract

The study aimed to describe the specialized health services and to identify areas of greater difficulty of access to specialized consultations offered by SUS in small cities in the 18th Regional Health Area of Paraná State, Brazil, using case study methodology. The data were collected between January and April 2015. Managers, management teams and the board of directors of the CIS (Consórcio Intermunicipal de Saúde) were interviewed. The 21 studied specialist areas were rated like Sufficient Quota, Insufficient Quota, Inexistent Supply, and Assistance Gap. The services with more difficulty of access were Vascular Surgery, Proctology, Geriatrics, Endocrinology, and Neurology, considered Inexistent Supply/Assistance Gap, and Orthopedics, Neuro-pediatrics, Urology, Rheumatology, Ophthalmology, and Otorhinolaryngology, were considered Insufficient Share. Contribute to the magnitude of the problem: lack of specialist doctors, private sector dependence and de decrease of the Federal and State Governments in financing the Health Sistem. Therefore, the gap in specialized healthcare is complex and difficult to solve in the short-terms, proving that this services have become a "bottleneck" in the SUS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Researcher 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,625,057
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#423
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,892
of 383,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.