↓ Skip to main content

Diaries for recovery from critical illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diaries for recovery from critical illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010468.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda J Ullman, Leanne M Aitken, Janice Rattray, Justin Kenardy, Robyne Le Brocque, Stephen MacGillivray, Alastair M Hull

Abstract

During intensive care unit (ICU) admission, patients experience extreme physical and psychological stressors, including the abnormal ICU environment. These experiences impact on a patient's recovery from critical illness and may result in both physical and psychological disorders. One strategy that has been developed and implemented by clinical staff to treat the psychological distress prevalent in ICU survivors is the use of patient diaries. These provide a background to the cause of the patient's ICU admission and an ongoing narrative outlining day-to-day activities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 19%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Researcher 20 10%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 23%
Psychology 23 11%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 49 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,387,984
of 16,722,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,609
of 11,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,729
of 310,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,722,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.