↓ Skip to main content

Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Su Golder, Heather M McIntosh, Yoon Loke

Abstract

In order to carry out a methodological research survey of systematic reviews of adverse effects we needed to retrieve a sample of systematic reviews in which the primary outcome is an adverse effect or effects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 7%
United Kingdom 3 6%
Brazil 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 11 20%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 48%
Computer Science 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,312,760
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,505
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,854
of 66,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.