You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are you a SCEPTIC? SoCial mEdia Precision & uTility In Conferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emergency Medicine Journal, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/emermed-2014-204216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damian Roland, Natalie May, Richard Body, Simon Carley, Mark D Lyttle |
| Abstract |
We analysed Twitter feeds at an emergency medicine scientific conference to determine the (1) accuracy of disseminated educational messages and the (2) use in providing rapid feedback to speakers. Most speakers were happy for key messages to be tweeted, and the majority of tweets (34/37) represented these accurately. It is important that speakers and conference organisers consider Twitter use and its potential benefits and disadvantages. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 32 | 36% |
| United States | 16 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 33% |
| Scientists | 20 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 26% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#436,676
of 24,380,741 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Journal
#80
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,371
of 370,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Journal
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.