You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Power distance and mentor-protégé relationship quality as moderators of the relationship between informal mentoring and burnout: evidence from China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-8-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Qian, Zhuo Han, Haiwan Wang, Xiaoyan Li, Qiuyue Wang |
| Abstract |
The topic of how to prevent and reduce burnout has drawn great attention from researchers and practitioners in recent years. However, we know little about how mentoring as a form of social support exerts influence on employee burnout. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 24% |
| Psychology | 10 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#12,713,868
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#438
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,355
of 361,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.