You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative genomic data of the Avian Phylogenomics Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-217x-3-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guojie Zhang, Bo Li, Cai Li, M Thomas P Gilbert, Erich D Jarvis, Jun Wang, The Avian Genome Consortium |
| Abstract |
The evolutionary relationships of modern birds are among the most challenging to understand in systematic biology and have been debated for centuries. To address this challenge, we assembled or collected the genomes of 48 avian species spanning most orders of birds, including all Neognathae and two of the five Palaeognathae orders, and used the genomes to construct a genome-scale avian phylogenetic tree and perform comparative genomics analyses (Jarvis et al. in press; Zhang et al. in press). Here we release assemblies and datasets associated with the comparative genome analyses, which include 38 newly sequenced avian genomes plus previously released or simultaneously released genomes of Chicken, Zebra finch, Turkey, Pigeon, Peregrine falcon, Duck, Budgerigar, Adelie penguin, Emperor penguin and the Medium Ground Finch. We hope that this resource will serve future efforts in phylogenomics and comparative genomics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 180 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#760,300
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#87
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,460
of 368,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.