↓ Skip to main content

Did Insecure Attachment Styles Evolve for the Benefit of the Group?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Did Insecure Attachment Styles Evolve for the Benefit of the Group?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem Eduard Frankenhuis

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 58%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,069,424
of 23,749,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,047
of 31,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,496
of 168,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#34
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,749,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.