↓ Skip to main content

Wider impacts of a 10-week community cooking skills program - Jamie’s Ministry of Food, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wider impacts of a 10-week community cooking skills program - Jamie’s Ministry of Food, Australia
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Herbert, Anna Flego, Lisa Gibbs, Elizabeth Waters, Boyd Swinburn, John Reynolds, Marj Moodie

Abstract

Jamie's Ministry of Food (JMoF) Australia is a 10-week community-based cooking skills program which is primarily aimed at increasing cooking skills and confidence and the promotion of eating a more nutritious diet. However, it is likely that the program influences many pathways to behaviour change. This paper explores whether JMoF impacted on known precursors to healthy cooking and eating (such as attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, cooking enjoyment and satisfaction and food purchasing behaviour) and whether there are additional social and health benefits which arise from program participation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 21%
Student > Bachelor 42 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 18%
Social Sciences 34 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Psychology 18 9%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 40 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#399,390
of 19,510,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#354
of 12,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,344
of 331,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#35
of 1,088 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,510,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,088 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.