↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Clinical and experimental studies of potentially pathogenic brain-directed autoantibodies: current knowledge and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Patents Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and experimental studies of potentially pathogenic brain-directed autoantibodies: current knowledge and future directions
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00415-014-7600-8
Pubmed ID
25491076
Authors

James Varley, Angela Vincent, Sarosh R. Irani

Abstract

The field of neuronal surface-directed antibody-mediated diseases of the central nervous system has dramatically expanded in the last few years and now forms an important cluster of treatable neurological conditions. In this review, we focus on three areas. First, we review the demographics, clinical features and treatment responses of these conditions. Second, we consider their pathophysiology and compare autoantibody mechanisms and their effects to genetic or pharmacological disruptions of the target antigens. Third, we discuss areas of controversy within the field, propose possible resolutions, and explore new directions for neuronal surface antibody-mediated diseases.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Other 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 19 33%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 34%
Neuroscience 13 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,596,403
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,172
of 4,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,995
of 361,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.