↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of a mobile phone-based malaria reporting system with source participant register data for capturing spatial and temporal trends in epidemiological indicators of malaria transmission…

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of a mobile phone-based malaria reporting system with source participant register data for capturing spatial and temporal trends in epidemiological indicators of malaria transmission collected by community health workers in rural Zambia
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-489
Pubmed ID
Authors

Busiku Hamainza, Gerry F Killeen, Mulakwa Kamuliwo, Adam Bennett, Joshua O Yukich

Abstract

Timeliness, completeness, and accuracy are key requirements for any surveillance system to reliably monitor disease burden and guide efficient resource prioritization. Evidence that electronic reporting of malaria cases by community health workers (CHWs) meet these requirements remains limited.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 31%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 23 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,678,401
of 19,458,329 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,681
of 5,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,119
of 331,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#131
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,458,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.