↓ Skip to main content

A transition program to primary health care for new graduate nurses: a strategy towards building a sustainable primary health care nurse workforce?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nursing, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A transition program to primary health care for new graduate nurses: a strategy towards building a sustainable primary health care nurse workforce?
Published in
BMC Nursing, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12912-014-0034-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Gordon, Christina Aggar, Anna M Williams, Lynne Walker, Simon M Willcock, Jacqueline Bloomfield

Abstract

This debate discusses the potential merits of a New Graduate Nurse Transition to Primary Health Care Program as an untested but potential nursing workforce development and sustainability strategy. Increasingly in Australia, health policy is focusing on the role of general practice and multidisciplinary teams in meeting the service needs of ageing populations in the community. Primary health care nurses who work in general practice are integral members of the multidisciplinary team - but this workforce is ageing and predicted to face increasing shortages in the future. At the same time, Australia is currently experiencing a surplus of and a corresponding lack of employment opportunities for new graduate nurses. This situation is likely to compound workforce shortages in the future. A national nursing workforce plan that addresses supply and demand issues of primary health care nurses is required. Innovative solutions are required to support and retain the current primary health care nursing workforce, whilst building a skilled and sustainable workforce for the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,386,678
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#578
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,274
of 356,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.