You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021 |
| Authors |
E.J. Theobald, A.K. Ettinger, H.K. Burgess, L.B. DeBey, N.R. Schmidt, H.E. Froehlich, C. Wagner, J. HilleRisLambers, J. Tewksbury, M.A. Harsch, J.K. Parrish |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 74% |
| Scientists | 21 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,020 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | <1% |
| Unknown | 971 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 203 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 174 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 169 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 110 | 11% |
| Other | 58 | 6% |
| Other | 130 | 13% |
| Unknown | 176 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 289 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 259 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 81 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 106 | 10% |
| Unknown | 225 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 403. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#76,268
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#44
of 6,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#721
of 362,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.