↓ Skip to main content

Children With Chronic Cough

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Children With Chronic Cough
Published in
CHEST, March 2015
DOI 10.1378/chest.14-2155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne B. Chang, Peter P. Van Asperen, Nicholas Glasgow, Colin F. Robertson, Craig M. Mellis, I. Brent Masters, Louis I. Landau, Laurel Teoh, Irene Tjhung, Helen L. Petsky, Peter S. Morris

Abstract

Chronic cough is associated with poor quality of life and may signify a serious underlying disease. Differentiating non-specific cough (when 'watchful waiting' can be safely undertaken) from specific cough (treatment and/or further investigations are beneficial) would be clinically useful. In 326 children, we aimed to; (a) determine how well cough pointers (used in guidelines) differentiate specific from non-specific cough; and (b) describe the clinical profile of children whose cough resolved without medications ('spontaneous-resolution').

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 65%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,774,687
of 17,391,055 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#3,864
of 10,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,968
of 313,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#70
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,391,055 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.