↓ Skip to main content

Dermatoscopia no teste cutâneo da patergia: série de casos de pacientes com suspeita de Doença de Behçet

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dermatoscopia no teste cutâneo da patergia: série de casos de pacientes com suspeita de Doença de Behçet
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.06.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Antonieta Rios Scherrer, Lúcia Porto Fonseca de Castro, Vanessa Barreto Rocha, Leonardo Pacheco

Abstract

Behçet's disease is a multisystemic disease consisting of a varying combination of ocular, mucocutaneous, neurologic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and other manifestations. Its diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, in which a positive pathergy test scores 1. A case series with 26 suspected patients is presented, and the skin pathergy test was performed in 23. The results were read in 48hours, and they were considered negative when without papule, and positive with a papule or pustule. Positive results were divided by papule size, and dermatoscopy was done to measure and observe its clinical aspects. After the readings, a biopsy was performed, with annotation of histopathological aspects. The test was negative in 2 (8.7%) and positive in 21 (91.3%) patients. The results and the literature review are presented.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 56%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 78%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,347,171
of 5,036,385 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#103
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,717
of 175,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,036,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.