You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A histopathological and biometric comparison between catfish (Pisces, Ariidae) from a harbor and a protected area, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Biosystems, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12999-014-0012-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raimunda Nonata Fortes Carvalho Neta, Débora Batista Pinheiro Sousa, Zafira da Silva de Almeida, Débora Martins Silva Santos, Ligia Tchaicka |
| Abstract |
Histopathological lesions and biometric variations in catfish species are statistically associated with chemical contaminant exposure. A histopathological and biometric database for the catfish Sciades herzbergii and Bagre bagre from São Luís Island (Port Area) and Caranguejos Island (Reference Area) is presented. Branchial and hepatic lesions were classified into three reaction patterns: 1) circulatory or inflammatory disturbances; 2) regressive changes; 3) progressive changes. This paper summarizes research efforts aimed at characterizing the biomonitoring potential of catfish from two islands in Brazil, which exhibit great habitat diversity and different levels of human intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Biosystems
#41
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,516
of 354,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Biosystems
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.