You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001941.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Djillali Annane, David Orlikowski, Sylvie Chevret |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 20% |
| Unknown | 106 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 117 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,316,521
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,071
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,408
of 362,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.