↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Physician Climate Advocacy in the Face of Political Denial

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
The Importance of Physician Climate Advocacy in the Face of Political Denial
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, December 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.sect1-1712
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Most physicians accept the general scientific discoveries about anthropogenic global warming and its dangers. Occasional denial by individual physicians of climate change can be readily answered by reference to the scientific consensus. But widespread, organized, political denial of climate change is hazardous to physicians' advocacy for an effective public health and health care response to climate change. This article assumes that physician climate advocacy is ethical and celebrates the many forms of health climate advocacy already under way. It concludes by drawing attention to measures that can scale up and strengthen the health care system's organized response to growing climate health hazards.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Social Sciences 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Psychology 1 14%