↓ Skip to main content

Ursodeoxycholic acid for cystic fibrosis-related liver disease.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ursodeoxycholic acid for cystic fibrosis-related liver disease.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000222.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng K, Ashby D, Smyth RL, Cheng, Katharine, Ashby, Deborah, Smyth, Rosalind L

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Chemistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#682,409
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,747
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,994
of 278,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.