↓ Skip to main content

Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: a pilot study in older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: a pilot study in older adults
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Schwenk, Gurtej S Grewal, Bahareh Honarvar, Stefanie Schwenk, Jane Mohler, Dharma S Khalsa, Bijan Najafi

Abstract

Wearable sensor technology can accurately measure body motion and provide incentive feedback during exercising. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness and user experience of a balance training program in older adults integrating data from wearable sensors into a human-computer interface designed for interactive training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 428 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 67 15%
Unknown 120 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 62 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 13%
Sports and Recreations 31 7%
Engineering 30 7%
Computer Science 24 5%
Other 100 23%
Unknown 134 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#423
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,872
of 360,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.