You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Use of Twitter at a major national pharmacy conference
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, January 2015
Nadia I. Awad, Craig Cocchio
The results of a study of Twitter use by attendees of the 2013 ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting (MCM) and other interested parties are presented.
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||18||78%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||8||18%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||16%|
|Student > Master||7||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||24%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||9%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2016.
All research outputs
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
of 3,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 356,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.