↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006215.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dumville JC, Munson C, Christie J, Dumville, Jo C, Munson, Christopher, Christie, Janice

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 50%
Other 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#963,101
of 7,420,052 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,464
of 8,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,495
of 227,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,420,052 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.