↓ Skip to main content

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006215.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dumville JC, Munson C, Christie J, Dumville, Jo C, Munson, Christopher, Christie, Janice

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Master 9 17%
Unspecified 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Other 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 41%
Unspecified 13 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,934,712
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,457
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,656
of 258,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.