↓ Skip to main content

The landscape of transposable elements in the finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The landscape of transposable elements in the finished genome of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Braham Dhillon, Navdeep Gill, Richard C Hamelin, Stephen B Goodwin

Abstract

In addition to gene identification and annotation, repetitive sequence analysis has become an integral part of genome sequencing projects. Identification of repeats is important not only because it improves gene prediction, but also because of the role that repetitive sequences play in determining the structure and evolution of genes and genomes. Several methods using different repeat-finding strategies are available for whole-genome repeat sequence analysis. Four independent approaches were used to identify and characterize the repetitive fraction of the Mycosphaerella graminicola (synonym Zymoseptoria tritici) genome. This ascomycete fungus is a wheat pathogen and its finished genome comprises 21 chromosomes, eight of which can be lost with no obvious effects on fitness so are dispensable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Colombia 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 87 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 17%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,039,706
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,583
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,024
of 334,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#34
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.