↓ Skip to main content

Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2643 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013
Published in
The Lancet, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61682-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators, Abubakar, II

Abstract

Up-to-date evidence on levels and trends for age-sex-specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality is essential for the formation of global, regional, and national health policies. In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013) we estimated yearly deaths for 188 countries between 1990, and 2013. We used the results to assess whether there is epidemiological convergence across countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 947 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 160 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 16 9%
Unspecified 14 8%
Other 43 25%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 36%
Unspecified 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 6%
Other 47 28%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1376. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,461
of 12,158,083 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#61
of 29,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 275,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,158,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.