↓ Skip to main content

How accurate are pedotransfer functions for bulk density for Brazilian soils?

Overview of attention for article published in Scientia Agricola, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How accurate are pedotransfer functions for bulk density for Brazilian soils?
Published in
Scientia Agricola, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0357
Authors

Raquel Stucchi Boschi, Felipe Ferreira Bocca, Maria Leonor Ribeiro Casimiro Lopes-Assad, Eduardo Delgado Assad

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Other 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 35%
Environmental Science 7 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#145
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,876
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.