↓ Skip to main content

Graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001484.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashwin Sachdeva, Mark Dalton, Sachiendra V Amaragiri, Timothy Lees

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 171 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Other 48 27%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 28 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#420,169
of 15,394,227 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,060
of 11,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,711
of 305,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,394,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.