You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isotonic versus hypotonic solutions for maintenance intravenous fluid administration in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009457.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah McNab, Robert S Ware, Kristen A Neville, Karen Choong, Mark G Coulthard, Trevor Duke, Andrew Davidson, Tavey Dorofaeff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 73 | 24% |
| Unknown | 71 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,817,487
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,515
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,425
of 361,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.