You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Migration delays caused by anthropogenic barriers: modeling dams, temperature, and success of migrating salmon smolts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1890/10-0593.1 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Marschall, Martha E. Mather, Donna L. Parrish, Gary W. Allison, James R. McMenemy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 28% |
| Researcher | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 25% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#3,066
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,816
of 246,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.