↓ Skip to main content

Migration delays caused by anthropogenic barriers: modeling dams, temperature, and success of migrating salmon smolts

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Migration delays caused by anthropogenic barriers: modeling dams, temperature, and success of migrating salmon smolts
Published in
Ecological Applications, December 2011
DOI 10.1890/10-0593.1
Authors

Elizabeth A. Marschall, Martha E. Mather, Donna L. Parrish, Gary W. Allison, James R. McMenemy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 30%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 43%
Environmental Science 34 28%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 25 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#9,628,441
of 12,541,300 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,932
of 2,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,603
of 287,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#43
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,541,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.