How Should Clinicians Weigh the Benefits and Harms of Discussing Politicized Topics that Influence Their Individual Patients’ Health?
AMA Journal of Ethics, December 2017
Health implications of politically charged phenomena are particularly difficult for physicians to discuss with their patients and communities. Addressing climate change and its associated health effects involves trade-offs between health and economic prosperity, necessitating that physicians weigh the potential benefits and risks of discussing climate change health effects. We argue that the potential benefits of physician communication and advocacy ultimately outweigh the potential risks. Therefore, physicians should be supported in their efforts to educate their patients and communities about climate change health effects. Furthermore, democratic deliberation could prove helpful in addressing disagreements among physicians within a practice about such politicized health topics.
|Korea, Republic of||2||8%|
|Members of the public||12||48%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||5||20%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||4%|
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||29%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||14%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||14%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||14%|