Title |
Symmetry Restoring Bifurcation in Collective Decision-Making
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003960 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natalia Zabzina, Audrey Dussutour, Richard P. Mann, David J. T. Sumpter, Stamatios C. Nicolis |
Abstract |
How social groups and organisms decide between alternative feeding sites or shelters has been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically. One key result is the existence of a symmetry-breaking bifurcation at a critical system size, where there is a switch from evenly distributed exploitation of all options to a focussed exploitation of just one. Here we present a decision-making model in which symmetry-breaking is followed by a symmetry restoring bifurcation, whereby very large systems return to an even distribution of exploitation amongst options. The model assumes local positive feedback, coupled with a negative feedback regulating the flow toward the feeding sites. We show that the model is consistent with three different strains of the slime mold Physarum polycephalum, choosing between two feeding sites. We argue that this combination of feedbacks could allow collective foraging organisms to react flexibly in a dynamic environment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 24% |
Germany | 2 | 10% |
Denmark | 2 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Sweden | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
Scientists | 8 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 26% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 21% |
Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 36% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 13% |
Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |