You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1711889114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Behrens, Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong, Thijs Bosker, João F. D. Rodrigues, Arjan de Koning, Arnold Tukker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 64% |
| Scientists | 17 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 628 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 98 | 16% |
| Researcher | 92 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 90 | 14% |
| Unknown | 177 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 118 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 5% |
| Engineering | 30 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 126 | 20% |
| Unknown | 215 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 642. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#34,678
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#983
of 103,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#713
of 448,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#30
of 950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.