↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
642 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the environmental impacts of dietary recommendations
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2017
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1711889114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Behrens, Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong, Thijs Bosker, João F. D. Rodrigues, Arjan de Koning, Arnold Tukker

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 642 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 642 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 15%
Researcher 91 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 12%
Student > Bachelor 66 10%
Other 30 5%
Other 88 14%
Unknown 193 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 117 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 13%
Social Sciences 31 5%
Engineering 30 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 4%
Other 125 19%
Unknown 231 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 651. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#35,942
of 26,245,199 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,004
of 104,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#712
of 450,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#28
of 950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,199 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.