Title |
The “Buy One, Get One Free” Ethics of Investing Public and Philanthropic Funds in Health and Climate
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.12.pfor1-1712 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ali A Zaidi |
Abstract |
This article applies various ethical frameworks to inform decision making about investment in two specific goods-strengthening public health and stabilizing the global climate. I begin by outlining how these goods traditionally competed for common and constrained resources. I then discuss how this view of competition has been rendered more problematic by emerging and compelling ethical justifications for investment in both goods based on utilitarian, Rawlsian, and communitarian analyses. I conclude by showing that these goods no longer compete head-to-head in a zero-sum way. Changes in science, technology, and society mean that investment in either good has the potential to advance both goods-that is, the goods have become synergistic. As a result, the case for investing in both is better. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Norway | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 22% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |