You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinyi Lin, Ai Ling Teh, Li Chen, Ives Yubin Lim, Pei Fang Tan, Julia L. MacIsaac, Alexander M. Morin, Fabian Yap, Kok Hian Tan, Seang Mei Saw, Yung Seng Lee, Joanna D. Holbrook, Keith M. Godfrey, Michael J. Meaney, Michael S. Kobor, Yap Seng Chong, Peter D. Gluckman, Neerja Karnani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,055,192
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,149
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,309
of 452,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#39
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.