↓ Skip to main content

EDTA chelation for symptomatic band keratopathy: results and recurrence

Overview of attention for article published in Eye, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EDTA chelation for symptomatic band keratopathy: results and recurrence
Published in
Eye, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/eye.2017.264
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Al-Hity, K Ramaesh, D Lockington

Abstract

PurposeTo identify causes of symptomatic band keratopathy, and assess the results and long-term recurrence rates following chelation with topical ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA).Patients and methodsA retrospective review of surgical logbooks identified patients managed by EDTA chelation for symptomatic band keratopathy from 2009 to 2015.ResultsWe identified 108 cases; 89 case notes were available for analysis. Most cases of band keratopathy were idiopathic (36%). The most commonly identified underlying diagnosis was long-term topical glaucoma therapy (27%). Median presenting visual acuity was 6/18 (range 6/6-NPL) with the visual axis affected in 97.8% of cases. Treatment involved corneal epithelium removal, recurrent application of topical EDTA, and subsequent debridement. The mean duration of the operation was 20 min (range 10-45). Mean initial follow-up time was 40 days, and the visual axis was clear in 97.8%. Visual acuity was maintained or improved in 79.8%, with 13.5% improving by two lines or more. The mean length of follow-up was 581 days (median 374, maximum 2438). Twenty-five eyes (28.1%) showed localised recurrence of calcium with a mean time of 546 days (median 374), but only four cases required repeat EDTA chelation. The median time between operations was 430 days. Thirty-two per cent of the recurrence cases were associated with hypotony or chronic presence of silicone oil.ConclusionsChelation of calcium with topical EDTA is a safe and effective treatment for band keratopathy. Visual acuity improves in most eyes and while the rate of recurrence is moderate, the need for retreatment is low (4.5% overall).Eye advance online publication, 1 December 2017; doi:10.1038/eye.2017.264.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,927,063
of 24,242,692 outputs
Outputs from Eye
#2,540
of 4,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,419
of 445,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye
#32
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,242,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.