↓ Skip to main content

Group cognitive behavioural therapy with compassion training for depression in a Japanese community: a single-group feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group cognitive behavioural therapy with compassion training for depression in a Japanese community: a single-group feasibility study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-3003-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenichi Asano, Haruna Koike, Yuriko Shinohara, Hiromi Kamimori, Akiko Nakagawa, Masaomi Iyo, Eiji Shimizu

Abstract

Depression is a representative mental problem, and more than 350 million people are suffering in the world. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in individual or group formats is mainly recommended in major guidelines. However, patients with high self-criticism have a poor response to CBT. To treat such patients, psychotherapies focusing on compassion are gaining attention. Although trials have begun to be reported, there are relatively few studies examining the effectiveness of group CBT with compassion work for managing depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability and the estimate effect size of group CBT with compassion training for future controlled studies. Fourteen participants were enrolled in the trial, of which 13 completed the intervention, and 12 completed a 6-month follow-up assessment. Participants received a 1 h group-based CBT with compassion training session every week for 10 weeks. The effect of the intervention on participants' Beck Depression Inventory score was examined using a general linear mixed model. This analysis showed an effect size of d = 1.12 at post intervention and d = 0.92 at 6-month follow-up. Group cognitive behavioural therapy with compassion training for depression shows feasibility and acceptability in a Japanese community. Trial Registration UMIN000015007.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 38%