| Title |
Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)33102-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael EJ Lean, Wilma S Leslie, Alison C Barnes, Naomi Brosnahan, George Thom, Louise McCombie, Carl Peters, Sviatlana Zhyzhneuskaya, Ahmad Al-Mrabeh, Kieren G Hollingsworth, Angela M Rodrigues, Lucia Rehackova, Ashley J Adamson, Falko F Sniehotta, John C Mathers, Hazel M Ross, Yvonne McIlvenna, Renae Stefanetti, Michael Trenell, Paul Welsh, Sharon Kean, Ian Ford, Alex McConnachie, Naveed Sattar, Roy Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,454 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 347 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 344 | 10% |
| United States | 307 | 9% |
| Spain | 107 | 3% |
| Canada | 96 | 3% |
| Mexico | 79 | 2% |
| Australia | 59 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 47 | 1% |
| France | 46 | 1% |
| Other | 386 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1636 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2657 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 420 | 12% |
| Scientists | 333 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 1% |
| Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,861 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1861 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 229 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 219 | 12% |
| Researcher | 180 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 172 | 9% |
| Other | 127 | 7% |
| Other | 330 | 18% |
| Unknown | 604 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 532 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 200 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 97 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 2% |
| Other | 245 | 13% |
| Unknown | 677 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4032. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,220
of 25,907,102 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#88
of 43,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 449,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#1
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,907,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.