↓ Skip to main content

1.食物アレルギーの歴史,定義,分類(第1回 食物アレルギー,専門医のためのアレルギー学講座)

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 205)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1.食物アレルギーの歴史,定義,分類(第1回 食物アレルギー,専門医のためのアレルギー学講座)
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.56.4_1
Authors

柴田 瑠美子

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,707,682
of 12,373,969 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#36
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,132
of 357,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them