↓ Skip to main content

Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
200 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1570 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1731 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production
Published in
Nature Climate Change, December 2014
DOI 10.1038/nclimate2470
Authors

S. Asseng, F. Ewert, P. Martre, R. P. Rötter, D. B. Lobell, D. Cammarano, B. A. Kimball, M. J. Ottman, G. W. Wall, J. W. White, M. P. Reynolds, P. D. Alderman, P. V. V. Prasad, P. K. Aggarwal, J. Anothai, B. Basso, C. Biernath, A. J. Challinor, G. De Sanctis, J. Doltra, E. Fereres, M. Garcia-Vila, S. Gayler, G. Hoogenboom, L. A. Hunt, R. C. Izaurralde, M. Jabloun, C. D. Jones, K. C. Kersebaum, A-K. Koehler, C. Müller, S. Naresh Kumar, C. Nendel, G. O’Leary, J. E. Olesen, T. Palosuo, E. Priesack, E. Eyshi Rezaei, A. C. Ruane, M. A. Semenov, I. Shcherbak, C. Stöckle, P. Stratonovitch, T. Streck, I. Supit, F. Tao, P. J. Thorburn, K. Waha, E. Wang, D. Wallach, J. Wolf, Z. Zhao, Y. Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,731 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Pakistan 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 1695 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 321 19%
Researcher 296 17%
Student > Master 216 12%
Student > Bachelor 120 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 88 5%
Other 245 14%
Unknown 445 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 547 32%
Environmental Science 197 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 123 7%
Engineering 73 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 4%
Other 185 11%
Unknown 538 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 419. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#70,666
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#293
of 4,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#628
of 361,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#3
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 131.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.