↓ Skip to main content

Layered oxygen-deficient double perovskite as an efficient and stable anode for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
597 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Layered oxygen-deficient double perovskite as an efficient and stable anode for direct hydrocarbon solid oxide fuel cells
Published in
Nature Materials, December 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmat4166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sivaprakash Sengodan, Sihyuk Choi, Areum Jun, Tae Ho Shin, Young-Wan Ju, Hu Young Jeong, Jeeyoung Shin, John T. S. Irvine, Guntae Kim

Abstract

Different layered perovskite-related oxides are known to exhibit important electronic, magnetic and electrochemical properties. Owing to their excellent mixed-ionic and electronic conductivity and fast oxygen kinetics, cation layered double perovskite oxides such as PrBaCo2O5 in particular have exhibited excellent properties as solid oxide fuel cell oxygen electrodes. Here, we show for the first time that related layered materials can be used as high-performance fuel electrodes. Good redox stability with tolerance to coking and sulphur contamination from hydrocarbon fuels is demonstrated for the layered perovskite anode PrBaMn2O5+δ (PBMO). The PBMO anode is fabricated by in situ annealing of Pr0.5Ba0.5MnO3-δ in fuel conditions and actual fuel cell operation is demonstrated. At 800 °C, layered PBMO shows high electrical conductivity of 8.16 S cm(-1) in 5% H2 and demonstrates peak power densities of 1.7 and 1.3 W cm(-2) at 850 °C using humidified hydrogen and propane fuels, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 427 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 121 27%
Researcher 65 15%
Student > Master 48 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 84 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 108 24%
Chemistry 57 13%
Engineering 51 12%
Energy 28 6%
Chemical Engineering 27 6%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 131 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,248,898
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#1,623
of 3,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,251
of 353,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#35
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.