You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indirect estimation of the prevalence of spinal muscular atrophy Type I, II, and III in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-017-0724-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathy Lally, Cynthia Jones, Wildon Farwell, Sandra P. Reyna, Suzanne F. Cook, W. Dana Flanders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#272,167
of 23,642,687 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#20
of 2,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,513
of 441,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,642,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.