↓ Skip to main content

Social Media, Evidence‐Based Tweeting, and JCEHP

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 217)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media, Evidence‐Based Tweeting, and JCEHP
Published in
The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/chp.21250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander M Djuricich, Djuricich, Alexander M., Alexander M. Djuricich

Abstract

Medical practice and medical journals must adapt to a constantly changing environment, in which social media plays an ever-increasing role. Social media platforms such as Twitter can provide an opportunity to disseminate information in innovative ways. The concept of evidence-based tweeting is introduced, especially as "tweeting the meeting" continues to expand within medical conferences and other venues important for continuing education for health care providers. Future social media strategies for the journal are outlined.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Other 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 46%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Computer Science 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#374,723
of 12,016,495 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#2
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,561
of 273,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,016,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them