You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social Media, Evidence‐Based Tweeting, and JCEHP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/chp.21250 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander M Djuricich |
| Abstract |
Medical practice and medical journals must adapt to a constantly changing environment, in which social media plays an ever-increasing role. Social media platforms such as Twitter can provide an opportunity to disseminate information in innovative ways. The concept of evidence-based tweeting is introduced, especially as "tweeting the meeting" continues to expand within medical conferences and other venues important for continuing education for health care providers. Future social media strategies for the journal are outlined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 39% |
| Canada | 9 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,234,664
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#10
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,107
of 360,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.